Three Years on: the Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in Iraq under the New York Convention
May 14, 2024
Three Years on: the Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in Iraq under the New York ConventionMay 14, 2024 The Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958) (the “New York Convention” or the “Convention”) is a pivotal international treaty established to streamline the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards across jurisdictions. The New York Convention mandates that member states recognize and enforce foreign arbitral awards issued in the jurisdiction of other member states, thus promoting uniformity and predictability in international arbitration. Courts of member states are generally required to enforce awards without entering into the substantive aspects of the dispute, and an award can only be challenged on the basis of one of the seven limited grounds specified by Article V of the New York Convention. Iraq's Ratification of the New York ConventionPrior to the New York Convention, the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Iraq was permitted on a limited basis under the Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Law (Law No. 30 of 1928) (the “Foreign Judgments Law”) and the Enforcement Law (Law No. 45 of 1980) (the “Enforcement Law”). Moreover, foreign awards were susceptible to being enforced through the Riyadh Convention on Judicial Cooperation (the “Riyadh Convention”) if the judgment or award was issued by one of the 18 state signatories to the Riyadh Convention. On 4 March 2021, the Iraqi Parliament issued the “Law on the Accession of the Republic of Iraq to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards" (the “Law of Accession”). This instrument ratified Iraq’s accession to the New York Convention. Notably, the Law of Accession made the following reservations:
Pursuant to the express terms of the Law of Accession, the New York Convention was to enter into force once it was published in the Iraqi Official Gazette, which took place on 31 May 2021. Key considerations for parties seeking Enforcement in Iraq under the New York ConventionTiming for Applicability of the New York ConventionArticle XII(2) of the New York Convention provides as follows: “For each State ratifying or acceding to this Convention after the deposit of the third instrument of ratification or accession, this Convention shall enter into force on the ninetieth day after deposit by such State of its instrument of ratification or accession.” (emphasis added) Iraq deposited the “instrument of ratification or accession”, i.e. the Law of Accession, on 11 November 2021, meaning that entry into force under Article XII(2) would in theory have been on 9 February 2022. The Law of Accession, on the other hand, provides that recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards under the New York Convention in Iraq is not possible prior to its publication in the Official Gazette. As indicated above, this took place on 31 May 2021, i.e. 9 months earlier than the 9 February 2022 effective date based on Article XII(2) of the Convention. In recent confidential proceedings before the Iraqi courts, the Baghdad Court of First Instance issued a decision determining that Article XII(2) of the New York Convention took precedence, and would therefore only apply to awards issued as from 9 February 2022. The Iraqi Court of Cassation subsequently affirmed the ruling of the lower court. Special considerations for awards implicating the Iraqi State or State EntitiesArticle 62 of the Enforcement Law prohibits the seizure of Iraqi State assets to settle a debt owed by the State. This essentially means that the Iraqi State, and Iraqi State-owned entities, are immune from enforcement against their assets to satisfy an arbitral award or court judgement. This restriction is limited to assets of the State located within Iraq, however. The Iraqi Public Companies Law No. 22 of 1997 (the “Public Companies Law”) defines a "State Company" as a self-financed unit, fully owned by the State, with corporate status and financial and administrative independence. Under the Public Companies Law, once a State-owned company is incorporated and its certificate of incorporation has been issued, that company is considered to have a distinct legal personality. Whether this would render its assets susceptible to enforcement remains to be tested. The risk that Iraqi courts may refuse to enforce an arbitral award against assets owned by State Entities, notwithstanding Iraq’s accession to the Convention, is therefore a crucial consideration for parties seeking to enforce arbitral awards against state-owned assets in Iraq. Latest InsightsLatest News
Latest Events
legal updates July 27, 2026 Ireland’s Presidency of the Council of the European Union legal updates July 27, 2026 EU adopts its 21st sanctions package against Russia and Belarus legal updates July 24, 2026 Global payment matters - July 2026 legal updates July 23, 2026 AI Governance Bill: Malaysia’s Next Step Towards the First AI Rulebook client news July 24, 2026 Advising Johnson Matthey on completion of the sale of its Catalyst Technolo... client news July 10, 2026 Setting sail: Eversheds Sutherland advises senior management of D-Marin on ... firm news July 10, 2026 Eversheds Sutherland advises OCBC on the landmark secondary dual listing of... client news July 09, 2026 Eversheds Sutherland advises Costello Medical on transition to employee own... virtual UAE - Employment law in the Dubai International Financial Centre September 10, 2026 9.30am - 1.30pm (GMT) Virtual in-person Managing AI use in the workplace: what every UK HR team needs to know September 10, 2026 9.30am - 1.00pm (BST) London, United Kingdom in-person Basic foundations of US employment law September 17, 2026 9.30am - 4.30pm (GMT) London, United Kingdom in-person 2026 BDC Roundtable September 23, 2026 Washington DC, United States |