Cum-cum-share deals: International investors in the focus of German criminal prosecution
Tax - The One Pager
April 15, 2025
Cum-cum-share deals: International investors in the focus of German criminal prosecutionTax - The One PagerApril 15, 2025 One of the most covered German tax scandals were the infamous cum-ex cases which resulted in numerous criminal convictions in recent years. Just recently public prosecutor’s offices across the nation shifted focus to cum-cum share deals and cum-cum/cum-ex variants involving primarily foreign investors. In March 2025, the Frankfurt Higher Regional Court allowed the public prosecution to bring charges against former managers of Deutsche Pfandbriefbank for tax evasion through cum-cum transactions. The tax loss in the case of cum-cum is considered times higher than cum-ex. Financial experts have estimated additional taxes of approx. 28.5 billion EUR. No wonder new investigation units and task forces at public prosecutor level are being established dedicated to holding investor and intermediates liable. StructureThere are many types of cum-cum structures ("dividend stripping"). In a nutshell, the idea is that foreign taxpayers avoid the full tax burden in Germany by transferring shares to domestic taxpayers shortly before the dividend record date. The domestic taxpayer is entitled to a capital gainer tax credit or refund, typically a local bank or other institution as domestic tax resident. Once the dividend has been paid out, it is transferred back to the foreign investor. Legal backgroundBy circular dated 9 July 2021 (BStBl 2021 I p. 995), the German tax authorities indicated to deem cum-cum-deals as abuse. A conviction for cum-cum by a criminal court has not yet taken place. The Frankfurt Higher Regional Court has only ruled on the initiation of court proceedings. In light of the cum-ex convictions individuals face long prison sentences and financial institutions face high fines and the confiscation of any profits. Risks and opportunities for financial institutionsWe expect that financial institutions involved in cum-cum deals will be targeted by public prosecutors and tax authorities. Companies should therefore be prepared for investigations. On the one hand, this includes preparation of all employees for dawn raids. On the other hand, consideration should be given to clarifying the facts through internal investigations and examining whether a voluntary disclosure is necessary to minimise the risks. Key take-awaysFinancial institutions should therefore:
Latest Insights
Latest News
Latest Events
legal updates October 08, 2026 A domestic base as an organisational unit eligible for a works council – no... legal updates October 08, 2026 The Commercial Payments Bill: Practical Implications for Commercial Contrac... guides and reports October 07, 2026 Technology, AI and the changing legal landscape of M&A guides and reports October 07, 2026 How AI is democratizing M&A for buyers and investors firm news October 07, 2026 Faster deals, deeper diligence: AI is transforming the legal landscape of M... firm news October 05, 2026 Leading finance partner joins Eversheds Sutherland firm news October 01, 2026 Eversheds Sutherland Switzerland appoints Dr. Michael Faske as new Partner deal alerts September 25, 2026 Eversheds Sutherland is advising Goodyear on the sale of its long-standing ... virtual Immigration UK – Right to work and compliance masterclass October 15, 2026 9.30am - 12.30pm (GMT) Virtual virtual German employment law training October 20, 2026 2pm - 5pm (GMT) Virtual virtual French employment law training November 03, 2026 2pm - 5pm (GMT) Virtual virtual Dutch employment law training November 10, 2026 2.00pm - 5.00pm (GMT) Virtual |